Skip to content 
Removing plastic eyes sounds like a small specification change, yet it changes the way a plush face has to be engineered. Once molded eyes are replaced by embroidery, appliqué, printing, or another soft facial treatment, the surface fabric becomes part of the expression itself. A beautiful character can lose its personality if the pile hides the pupils, dense stitching pulls the face inward, or a stretchy fabric changes the eye spacing after the head is filled. That is why fabric selection should begin with the finished face, not with whichever swatch feels softest in the hand.
For plush toys without plastic eyes, short plush, minky, and velboa are usually the strongest starting points because they give embroidered or appliquéd facial details a controlled, readable surface. The final choice still depends on pile height, stretch, shedding, hand feel, target age, washing expectations, embroidery density, and the shape of the stuffed head. No single fabric is automatically best for every character or product category.
The practical test comes after the fabric leaves the swatch card. Imagine approving a friendly character with fine sleepy eyes, then seeing the first stuffed sample with half the eyelash line buried in the pile and one pupil pulled slightly outward by filling pressure. Nothing is technically missing, yet the character feels wrong. The following sections explain how experienced plush developers prevent that outcome by linking material choice, facial construction, sampling, safety review, and production control from the beginning.
What Changes Without Plastic Eyes?
When plastic eyes are removed, the face stops being mainly a hardware decision and becomes a textile-construction decision. The fabric must carry embroidered, appliquéd, or printed features without hiding detail, distorting after stuffing, or changing the intended expression. Pile height, stretch, surface density, embroidery placement, and filling pressure therefore become central parts of facial development rather than secondary fabric preferences.
What Replaces Plastic Eyes?
Embroidery is usually the first soft alternative because the eye becomes part of the textile surface instead of a separate molded component. It works well for baby plush, character plush, animal plush, mascots, and designs where expression must remain consistent across a production run. The same technique can create noses, mouths, eyebrows, eyelashes, freckles, highlights, logos, and small character markings. Appliqué is useful when the eye needs larger color blocks that would become too heavy or stiff if they were fully filled with thread, while printing can handle gradients or very fine graphics that are difficult to reproduce economically with dense embroidery.
These methods should not be treated as interchangeable decoration. A simple two-color cartoon eye may embroider cleanly on short plush, while a shaded illustrated eye may need to be simplified, split into appliqué and embroidery, or moved onto a smoother face panel. The right decision is the one that preserves the character without creating unnecessary stiffness or production variation. In many commercial designs, the best answer is a hybrid: appliqué for the main eye shape, embroidery for outlines and pupils, and printing only where small tonal details genuinely add value.
How Does the Face Change?
A plastic eye creates depth through a three-dimensional part installed at a defined point. An embroidered eye behaves differently because it is flat and visually tied to the textile beneath it. The final expression therefore depends on eye spacing, eye angle, head curvature, seam position, pile direction, and the way the fabric stretches after filling. Moving one eye slightly inward can make a character look younger; rotating it can make the same face look sleepy, suspicious, surprised, or simply incorrect. People notice these changes quickly because the eyes are usually the strongest reference point for recognizing a character.
For that reason, facial accuracy should be reviewed as a system rather than an embroidery-only issue. Pattern shape controls the curved surface, fabric behavior controls how that surface moves, embroidery placement controls expression, and stuffing pressure determines the final three-dimensional distortion. The face can look perfect on a flat embroidery panel and still change after sewing and filling. A dependable development process therefore checks the expression again on the completed sample and records the approved pattern, fabric, embroidery file, placement, and filling reference before bulk production begins.
What Must the Fabric Do?
Fabric for a no-plastic-eye product has to solve tactile, visual, and production needs at the same time. It should feel appropriate for the product, keep the facial features visible, withstand embroidery without excessive puckering, and remain stable enough that repeated units do not develop noticeably different expressions. Important control points include GSM, pile height, pile direction, stretch behavior, color fastness, shedding, thickness, hand feel, embroidery performance, shape retention, compression recovery, and color-lot consistency. A fabric that excels in only one of these areas can still be the wrong choice for the finished plush.
This is where the common instruction to choose the ‘softest’ fabric becomes too simplistic. A very soft surface may hide narrow pupils or eyelashes; a very stable short-pile textile may hold embroidery perfectly but feel too basic for a premium comfort product. Experienced developers often divide the product into material zones instead of forcing one fabric to do every job. The body can use a softer or longer-pile textile while the face, muzzle, inner ears, or other detail-sensitive areas use a more controlled surface. Once the eye becomes textile-based, the fabric is no longer a background material; it becomes part of the eye system itself.
Which Fabrics Work Best?
Short plush, minky, and velboa are usually the most practical starting points for plush toys with embroidered or textile-based eyes because they provide a controlled surface and good facial visibility. Soft fleece and cotton-based materials can also work for selected products. Long-pile faux fur remains useful for realistic or shaggy designs, but it normally requires larger graphics, material zoning, or another facial construction strategy.
Minky
Minky is a strong choice when softness is part of the product identity but the face still needs enough surface control for embroidery. It suits baby plush, comfort-oriented animals, soft character toys, and designs that should feel gentle rather than highly realistic. Its smooth hand makes it attractive for products that are frequently hugged or handled, yet the category is broad: different minky qualities can vary in thickness, surface texture, stretch, density, shine, and recovery. Two fabrics sold under the same general name may behave very differently once an eye is stitched into them and the head is filled.
For that reason, the real production fabric should be tested rather than approving the word ‘minky’ on a specification sheet. A dense eye can compress the pile and create a noticeably firmer patch, while a stretchy quality can pull the eye wider after stuffing. The useful question is not whether minky is generally good for embroidered eyes, but whether this exact minky gives the desired face at the intended embroidery size and filling pressure. Testing the actual eye, on the actual fabric, inside the actual head pattern gives a much more dependable answer than judging an isolated swatch.
Short Plush and Velboa
Short plush is one of the easiest materials to control when a face contains several small features. Pupils, eyelids, eyebrows, mouth lines, nostrils, or fine character markings remain more visible because surrounding fibers are less likely to fall over the stitching. This is especially valuable for licensed characters and mascots where recognition depends on expression rather than fur realism. A clean surface also makes visual inspection easier because embroidery edges and placement can be seen quickly during production, reducing the chance that a subtle facial shift moves too far through the sewing line before someone notices it.
Velboa offers a similarly controlled surface and is often useful for graphic characters, small plush products, promotional items, and designs where clear embroidery or printing matters alongside cost control. Its flatter pile can make eye boundaries look crisp, although hand feel, stretch, sheen, and overall product positioning still need to be checked. Neither short plush nor velboa should be chosen automatically just because they are easy to embroider. The fabric still has to fit the brand’s expected touch, visual quality, durability, and retail position, but they are dependable starting points when facial precision matters more than a shaggy effect.
| Fabric | Face Detail | Typical Strength | Primary Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minky | High | Soft hand with clean embroidery | Stretch and thread compression |
| Short plush | High | Precise small facial details | Pile direction and density |
| Velboa | High | Flat, graphic surface | Hand feel and product positioning |
| Soft fleece | Medium-High | Soft textile appearance | Stretch and dimensional stability |
| Long-pile faux fur | Low-Medium | Realistic or shaggy effect | Facial detail visibility |
Cotton, Fleece, and Long Pile
Cotton and cotton-blend fabrics can work well for plush products that intentionally look textile-based rather than furry. Soft dolls, nursery characters, comforters, and some educational toys benefit from that cleaner visual language. Soft fleece is another useful option when warmth and touch matter more than fur realism. These fabrics still need checks for dimensional stability, stretch, seam behavior, embroidery response, and washing performance, because a clean flat surface does not automatically guarantee a stable finished face after repeated handling or care cycles.
Long-pile faux fur serves a different purpose. It is valuable for realistic dogs, cats, bears, lions, wildlife characters, and fantasy creatures where texture is part of the identity, but it creates a visibility challenge for soft facial details. The usual solution is not to abandon long pile; it is to separate functions. Designers can keep long fur on the head, cheeks, mane, or body while using a shorter face panel, a smoother muzzle, larger eye shapes, stronger contrast, or a combined appliqué-and-embroidery construction. The best fabric plan often uses several materials so each area can do what it does best.
How Does Pile Height Affect Eyes?
Pile height determines how much of an embroidered or appliquéd eye remains visible above the fabric surface. Short pile generally gives cleaner edges and better definition for small details, while longer pile can soften or partially hide pupils, eyelashes, outlines, and mouth lines. The best pile is determined by feature size, fiber density, pile direction, product scale, and the final stuffed geometry rather than by one universal number.
Detail Visibility
The easiest way to understand pile height is to compare the size of the surrounding fibers with the smallest facial detail that must remain visible. A large oval eye on a 30 cm plush can tolerate a different surface from a tiny pupil highlight, narrow eyelash, or mouth corner on an 8 cm charm. The more the design depends on small lines and sharp boundaries, the more important a controlled pile becomes. This is why fixed pile-height rules rarely work across an entire product range; the relevant question is whether the material lets the smallest necessary visual feature survive sewing, brushing, stuffing, and normal handling.
Close-up inspection can also give a false sense of security. A line that is technically present may still disappear at normal viewing distance once fibers fall over it. For character merchandise, the face should be judged the way a customer sees it on a shelf, in a product photo, or in the hand, not only under factory lighting from a few centimeters away. Testing the artwork at one hundred percent production size is therefore more meaningful than enlarging it on a monitor, because actual scale exposes which eye highlights, lashes, eyebrows, or narrow outlines are too delicate for the chosen surface.
Pile Direction
Pile direction influences more than touch. Many plush fabrics look lighter in one direction and darker in another because the fibers reflect light differently. If the left and right facial panels are cut in opposing directions, the head can appear visually asymmetrical even when the paper pattern and embroidery positions are correct. One cheek may look darker, one eye area may appear deeper, or the entire head may seem slightly twisted in photographs. These differences become especially noticeable on simple mascots, symmetrical animals, and products photographed against clean e-commerce backgrounds where there are few other visual elements to distract the eye.
Controlling pile direction therefore belongs in the cutting and pattern process, not only in material selection. The approved sample should establish how each face panel is oriented, and bulk cutting should follow that reference consistently. This is also important when multiple color lots are used across repeat orders, because a small difference in fiber direction or surface finish can make the face look different even when the nominal color matches. A good sample records not only which fabric was used, but how that fabric was oriented and finished around the character’s most recognizable features.
Long Pile at Actual Scale
Long-pile fabric can still work very well without plastic eyes, but the face normally needs to be designed around the material instead of treated as an afterthought. Larger embroidered shapes, simplified outlines, higher contrast, short-pile eye panels, smooth muzzles, or appliqué can preserve readability while keeping the shaggy character of the rest of the toy. For realistic animals, this often produces a better result than trimming every facial area flat, because the product keeps its natural fur effect while the eyes remain visually controlled and easy to reproduce.
The final decision should be made on a complete stuffed sample. Embroider the actual eye at the intended size, use the real thread colors and stitch construction, orient the pile correctly, sew the production pattern, and fill the head to the planned firmness. Then review the face from the front, both three-quarter views, and the side. Head curvature can expose or hide different areas of the embroidery, so a flat test panel is only the first checkpoint. The true test specimen is the finished three-dimensional face that customers will actually see.
How Does Fabric Affect Embroidery?
Fabric affects embroidery through stretch, thickness, pile, density, surface stability, and recovery. These properties influence eye shape, edge definition, puckering, stiffness, and placement accuracy. A dependable facial embroidery specification therefore controls the textile together with the DST file, stitch density, thread color, embroidery size, placement, and final stuffed shape instead of treating embroidery as decoration added after fabric selection during development.
Stretch and Eye Shape
Stretch can change facial proportions after stuffing even when the embroidery machine has produced a perfectly symmetrical pair of eyes. Filling creates tension across the head, and many plush fabrics stretch differently across different directions. A face with large eyes, firm filling, or embroidery close to a curved seam is especially sensitive because a small change in surface tension can make one eye appear wider, higher, or more angled than the other. The effect is often subtle enough to pass a flat-panel inspection but obvious enough to change the character once the toy is fully assembled.
The answer is not simply to avoid stretch. Controlled elasticity can help create smooth rounded forms and a soft hand. The goal is to understand how the fabric behaves and build the pattern and embroidery placement around that behavior. Face panels should be tested through the full sequence of embroidery, cutting, sewing, turning, filling, shaping, and measurement. If the expression changes significantly after filling, the engineering team may need to alter the pattern, stabilize the area, change placement, adjust filling firmness, or select a more stable fabric rather than trying to correct the appearance only at final inspection.
Stitch Density and Surface Feel
More stitches do not automatically create better embroidery. High density can improve visual coverage, especially in large dark eyes, but it also adds thread mass to a small area. On soft fabric this can compress the pile, stiffen the face, pull the surrounding textile inward, or create visible puckering around the embroidered edge. A fully filled cartoon eye therefore behaves differently from a thin outlined eye even when both occupy the same general size. The embroidery needs enough coverage to look clean without turning a soft facial panel into a hard patch.
A production-ready specification should connect several variables instead of adjusting stitch density in isolation. The DST file controls stitch path, thread color controls character and brand accuracy, embroidery size controls readability, placement controls expression, thread thickness affects line character, and fabric compatibility determines whether the chosen surface can support the design cleanly. Edge cleanliness and batch consistency matter as well because one clean prototype is not enough. The successful combination is the one that looks right, feels right, and can be repeated across the planned quantity without regular manual correction.
| Control | What It Influences | Production Check |
|---|---|---|
| DST file | Stitch path and repeatability | Use the approved file version |
| Thread color | Character and brand color | Match the confirmed thread reference |
| Stitch density | Coverage and hand feel | Avoid puckering or excessive stiffness |
| Embroidery size | Detail readability | Check at actual product scale |
| Placement | Expression and symmetry | Reference pattern registration points |
| Thread thickness | Line definition | Match fine or bold details appropriately |
| Fabric compatibility | Visibility and stability | Confirm pile does not hide the design |
Placement and Bulk Repeatability
Placement errors often change a character more than small stitch defects. If one eye sits slightly higher, the face can look skeptical; if both eyes move inward, the character can appear younger or more intense; if a pupil rotates, the toy may look cross-eyed even when every stitch is technically clean. For recognizable characters, eye positions should therefore be linked to defined pattern references or registration points rather than estimated from the edge of a flexible fabric panel. This is particularly important in multi-character collections where each face intentionally differs but each approved expression still needs to be reproduced consistently.
Once the face is approved, the embroidery file, thread references, fabric specification, pile orientation, pattern version, filling reference, and finishing method should be treated as one controlled package. The same DST file can produce a different-looking face if the fabric stretches more, the head is stuffed more firmly, or the seam allowance shifts. Consistency is therefore the result of several processes working together, supported by incoming-material checks, embroidery inspection, sewing inspection, filling control, and comparison with the approved sample throughout production rather than only at the end.
Are No-Plastic Eyes Safer?
Removing detachable plastic eyes can reduce one category of hard-component and small-part risk, especially for infant and young-child plush. It does not make the finished product automatically compliant. Fabric, seams, filling, accessories, labels, intended age, chemical requirements, mechanical construction, and the target market still need to be reviewed as one complete product before safety claims or compliance decisions are made.
Small-Part Risk
An embroidered eye has a straightforward structural advantage: there is no separate molded eye body that must remain attached to the head. For baby plush, comfort toys, soft dolls, and other products designed around an all-soft feel, reducing detachable hard components can make the construction easier to manage and more appropriate for the intended experience. The same principle often leads developers to consider embroidered noses, sewn textile details, and simplified accessories instead of adding decorative hardware that contributes little to the character but creates another attachment point to control.
That does not mean the eyes are the only components worth reviewing. A plush with embroidered eyes can still include buttons, bells, zippers, keychain hardware, decorative charms, removable clothing, plastic accessories, or electronic modules. A useful safety review asks what can become accessible, detached, sharp, or unsuitable for the intended age group across the complete design. Looking at the entire product prevents a common mistake in which one obvious hard component is removed while several smaller or less visible attachment risks remain elsewhere in the toy.
Compliance Is Product-Wide
Compliance decisions have to consider the full product because safety requirements cover much more than facial hardware. Development may need to review material chemistry, color fastness, flammability, mechanical construction, seam security, filling containment, sharp points or edges, accessory attachment, labels, age grading, and market-specific requirements. The exact plan depends on what the product is, who it is intended for, where it will be sold, and what additional functions or components are included. Embroidered eyes can simplify one area of the design, but they do not remove the need for a broader assessment.
For projects intended for markets such as the United States, the European Union, or the United Kingdom, manufacturers commonly prepare around applicable requirements such as ASTM F963, CPSIA, EN71, and related market obligations. The appropriate testing scope still varies by product and should be established from the intended age group, materials, accessories, and sales destination. It is better to make those decisions before the sample is locked, because changing a hard component, label, fabric, coating, or accessory late in development can affect cost, timing, and the approved appearance.
Baby Plush and Age Grading
Baby and infant-oriented products are the clearest examples of where soft facial construction can be useful because softness, limited hard components, secure seams, and easy-care expectations are closely connected to the product concept. Typical material directions may include minky, short plush, soft fleece, or selected cotton-based fabrics, while embroidered eyes and noses help keep the face visually expressive without relying on projecting molded parts. The design still needs to be assessed as a whole, including fabric shedding, seam strength, filling containment, labels, decorative elements, and the expected care method.
Age grading should be established early because it influences more than the eyes. It can affect material choices, accessory decisions, labeling, testing, and how much complexity is sensible in the face. A baby plush with oversized embroidered features may be more robust and easier to keep soft than a tiny face packed with dense thread and multiple decorative layers. The strongest designs use safety and character development together rather than treating them as competing goals. A simplified eye can still carry a distinctive personality if proportion, color, spacing, and expression are handled carefully.
How Should Fabric Be Approved
Fabric should be approved through the finished plush, not from a swatch alone. Start with pile, GSM, stretch, shedding, color, hand feel, and embroidery response; then test the real facial artwork, sew and fill the prototype, review expression and distortion, and finally lock the approved fabric, embroidery, pattern, color, filling, and QC references before bulk production starts and materials are committed to the production line.
Swatch Review
A swatch is useful for narrowing options, but it cannot answer every production question. The review should cover color, pile length, GSM, hand feel, shedding, color difference, elasticity, pile direction, surface density, and how the material responds to embroidery. For a face without plastic eyes, the team should also ask whether the smallest pupil, eyelash, eyebrow, or mouth detail remains visible, whether the stitched area becomes noticeably harder, whether brushing changes the expression, and whether the material returns to shape after normal compression or handling. These checks connect the fabric to the actual product instead of treating it as an isolated textile purchase.
Material choice also needs to consider supply continuity and repeat orders. A beautiful face can become difficult to reproduce if a later batch has a different pile direction, density, sheen, or color lot. Delsney maintains more than 600 plush fabric options across different pile heights, textures, and hand-feel directions, which is useful only when those choices are narrowed against the product brief rather than presented as an oversized swatch library. The most relevant material is the one that supports the character, intended user, target market, embroidery method, price level, and planned production volume together.
Prototype Review
The stuffed prototype is where hidden interactions finally become visible. Curvature changes eye spacing, filling pressure changes surface tension, seams pull neighboring panels in different directions, and the surrounding pile can cover details that looked perfectly clear on a flat embroidery sample. Review the front view, both three-quarter views, and side profile, then compare eye-to-eye spacing, eye-to-mouth relationship, pupil direction, eyebrow angle, seam influence, stuffing firmness, and hand feel around the embroidered area. If the expression is wrong at this stage, it is much safer to correct the pattern, fabric, embroidery, or filling before bulk materials are committed.
The sample should also be treated as a future production standard rather than a presentation piece that only needs to impress during approval. If a large embroidered eye becomes too stiff, reducing thread coverage or using appliqué may be better than simply increasing density. If long pile hides eyelashes, a shorter facial zone can be cleaner than making the lashes unnaturally thick. Good sample development is a series of controlled trade-offs that protects the most important visual characteristics while keeping the construction practical to reproduce.
Approval Gates and Bulk Consistency
A dependable approval process moves through clear gates so problems can be traced to the stage that caused them. Fabric review establishes the material specification, the embroidery test confirms design visibility and hand feel, the sewn head checks seam and placement effects, and the stuffed sample confirms the final expression. Once approved, the pattern version, DST file, thread references, fabric specification, pile direction, filling reference, measurements, labels, and packaging details should remain linked to the approved sample so bulk production has a complete standard rather than a collection of separate instructions.
For planning purposes, Delsney’s standard plush samples usually take about 5-7 days, while more complex products generally require around 7-15 days. Standard bulk production is typically about 20-30 days after sample approval, with timing adjusted for material availability, quantity, packaging, testing, and product complexity. The development system is supported by 25+ engineers, 10+ designers, and 20+ QC staff. These figures matter because fabric approval is not useful unless the decision can be carried through pattern development, embroidery, sewing, filling, inspection, and repeat production with the same reference points.
| Approval Gate | Primary Question | Record / Typical Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric review | Does the surface suit the face? | Fabric specification and color/pile reference |
| Embroidery test | Are details clear and stable? | Approved DST file and thread reference |
| Sewn head | Do seams or stretch shift placement? | Confirmed pattern version |
| Stuffed prototype | Does the final expression match? | Filling and measurement reference |
| Final sample | Is the product ready to reproduce? | Approved sample; standard sample often 5-7 days, complex 7-15 days |
| Bulk production | Can output stay consistent? | QC records; standard production often 20-30 days after approval |
Choosing Fabric Around the Finished Face
Removing plastic eyes does not make fabric selection simpler; in many products it makes the material more important because the expression now lives directly on the textile surface. Short plush, minky, and velboa are dependable starting points for many embroidered faces, while fleece, cotton-based materials, and long-pile faux fur can work well when their behavior matches the design. The strongest decision comes from testing the face at real scale, on the real fabric, inside the real stuffed head rather than choosing from a swatch by touch alone.
For brands developing a new character, baby plush, animal collection, mascot, or licensed range, the practical goal is to connect material choice with pattern engineering, embroidery control, sampling, safety review, and bulk consistency. Delsney approaches fabric selection as one part of the complete product-development process, so the approved material is judged by how well it protects character identity, softness, manufacturability, and repeat production. When those factors are considered together, a no-plastic-eye design can feel intentional rather than like a compromise made late in development.
Frequently Asked Questions
What fabric is best for embroidered eyes on plush toys?
Short plush, minky, and velboa are the most practical starting points for many embroidered-eye designs because their surfaces keep facial details visible and provide enough stability for clean stitching. The best choice still depends on eye size, pile density, fabric stretch, stuffing pressure, target age, hand-feel requirements, and the intended price position. A production sample should always confirm the decision because two fabrics in the same category can behave differently after embroidery and filling.
Are embroidered eyes safer than plastic safety eyes?
Embroidered eyes can reduce the need for a separate hard eye component and therefore remove one attachment point that may be relevant to small-part risk, particularly in infant or young-child plush. They do not automatically make the complete toy compliant. Seams, filling, accessories, labels, material chemistry, sharp points or edges, age grading, and market-specific requirements still need to be reviewed for the entire product before any safety or compliance conclusion is made.
Can minky fabric be used with detailed embroidery?
Yes, minky can support detailed embroidery and is widely used when softness and a smooth character appearance are both important. The exact quality matters because minky varies in pile, density, stretch, thickness, and recovery. Dense embroidery can compress the surface or make a facial area firmer, while stretch can change eye shape after stuffing. The safest development method is to embroider the final artwork at production size and judge it on a fully sewn and filled prototype.
Can long-pile faux fur be used without plastic eyes?
Yes, but long pile usually requires more deliberate facial engineering because fibers can partially cover embroidered outlines, pupils, eyelashes, and narrow mouth lines. Common solutions include larger eye graphics, simplified embroidery, stronger contrast, short-pile facial panels, smoother muzzles, or a combination of appliqué and embroidery. The finished head should be tested from normal viewing angles because a detail that looks clear on a flat panel may become hidden after sewing, brushing, and stuffing.
How can embroidered eyes be prevented from puckering?
Puckering is usually controlled by balancing the embroidery design with the actual fabric rather than increasing stitch density without limit. The development team should review stitch path, density, thread thickness, embroidery size, fabric stretch, surface stability, and the way the panel is supported during embroidery. The result then needs to be checked after sewing and stuffing because a face can appear flat and clean before assembly but develop tension or distortion once the head takes its final three-dimensional shape.
What should a brand provide before fabric selection starts?
A useful project brief includes the artwork or character reference, target product size, estimated quantity, intended age group, target market, preferred facial construction, material preferences, packaging requirements, and expected delivery timing. If there are critical visual details such as eyelashes, pupil highlights, realistic fur zones, or specific softness requirements, those should be identified early as well. Clear inputs allow the manufacturer to evaluate fabric, embroidery, safety considerations, cost, and production feasibility together instead of making disconnected decisions.
